2025 · AMCIS 2025, Data Science / SIG DSA (ERF)
Multi-Dimensional Bias Analysis in LLMs Using Hierarchical and Interaction Models
Evidence basis: abstract-and-metadata-reviewed · Review status: catalog-reviewed; paper-author approval pending
machine-learning responsible-ai llm-evaluation
LLM bias hierarchical bias analysis interaction effects ChatGPT Gemini bias dimensions data bias algorithmic bias societal bias
Core contribution: The abstract proposes a multi-dimensional, hierarchical view of LLM bias that accounts for direct propagation, cascading effects, and feedback loops.
Catalog abstract summary
The official abstract describes a five-layer framework for analyzing interacting bias dimensions in large language models, with ChatGPT and Gemini used as illustrative systems and context-dependent ranking of bias dimensions.
Source: AIS Electronic Library official abstract, paraphrased; full paper not obtained.
Problem and motivation
Single-axis bias checks can miss interactions among data, algorithmic, surface-level, operational, and societal influences.
Method and contribution
At abstract level, the framework organizes analysis into five layers—Data, Algorithmic, Surface-Level, Operational, and Societal Influence—and describes context-dependent ranking of bias dimensions. The detailed statistical model and dataset are not verified.
Findings and evidence
The abstract names ChatGPT and Gemini as illustrative case-study systems and claims that the framework can dynamically rank bias dimensions by context. No numeric result is asserted without the full paper.
Limitations and future directions
Limitations: The full PDF, complete page range, statistical procedure, data, baselines, and quantitative results were not available in this audit.
Future work: The paper-specific future-work section remains unverified and should be added after full-text retrieval.
Sources and identifiers
- Institutional publication record publication_signal
- Official abstract page public_abstract
When to cite this paper
Cite this paper when its specific method, evidence, or benchmark is directly relevant.
- The paper's method is directly relevant.
- The paper's evidence or benchmark is directly relevant.
Citation
@inproceedings{ezzatiJivan2025multidimensional,
author = {Basil Syed and Daniel Arana Charlebois and Naser Ezzati-Jivan and Leila Tahmooresnejad and Anteneh Ayanso},
title = {Multi-Dimensional Bias Analysis in LLMs Using Hierarchical and Interaction Models},
year = {2025},
booktitle = {AMCIS 2025, Data Science / SIG DSA (ERF)},
url = {https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2025/data_science/sig_dsa/15/}
}Other citation formats for Word and reference managers
Syed, B., Charlebois, D. A., Ezzati-Jivan, N., Tahmooresnejad, L., & Ayanso, A. (2025). Multi-Dimensional Bias Analysis in LLMs Using Hierarchical and Interaction Models. In AMCIS 2025, Data Science / SIG DSA (ERF). https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2025/data_science/sig_dsa/15/B. Syed, D. A. Charlebois, N. Ezzati-Jivan, L. Tahmooresnejad, and A. Ayanso, "Multi-Dimensional Bias Analysis in LLMs Using Hierarchical and Interaction Models," in AMCIS 2025, Data Science / SIG DSA (ERF), 2025, [Online]. Available: https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2025/data_science/sig_dsa/15/